Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
HC held that where a petitioner deposited amounts under section 71 of the State GST Act, 2017 and allegations of fraud and willful misstatement or suppression of facts arose, any deposit found to be in excess shall not be refunded immediately but may be adjusted at final adjudication or set off against any amounts found due in the petitioner's favour. The court directed that invoking authorities must proceed expeditiously with post-inspection adjudicatory steps under section 71 in accordance with the statutory scheme. The petition is disposed of with the above directions.
HC held that where a petitioner deposited amounts under section 71 of the State GST Act, 2017 and allegations of fraud and willful misstatement or suppression of facts arose, any deposit found to be in excess shall not be refunded immediately but may be adjusted at final adjudication or set off against any amounts found due in the petitioner's favour. The court directed that invoking authorities must proceed expeditiously with post-inspection adjudicatory steps under section 71 in accordance with the statutory scheme. The petition is disposed of with the above directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
