Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
HC held that where a petitioner deposited amounts under section 71 of the State GST Act, 2017 and allegations of fraud and willful misstatement or suppression of facts arose, any deposit found to be in excess shall not be refunded immediately but may be adjusted at final adjudication or set off against any amounts found due in the petitioner's favour. The court directed that invoking authorities must proceed expeditiously with post-inspection adjudicatory steps under section 71 in accordance with the statutory scheme. The petition is disposed of with the above directions.
HC held that where a petitioner deposited amounts under section 71 of the State GST Act, 2017 and allegations of fraud and willful misstatement or suppression of facts arose, any deposit found to be in excess shall not be refunded immediately but may be adjusted at final adjudication or set off against any amounts found due in the petitioner's favour. The court directed that invoking authorities must proceed expeditiously with post-inspection adjudicatory steps under section 71 in accordance with the statutory scheme. The petition is disposed of with the above directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
