Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The HC upheld the decision favoring the assessee, concluding that External Development Charges (EDC) received by a government authority from private builders constitute "rent" for use of land and therefore fall within the taxable ambit under the relevant TDS provisions; the Assessing Officer's characterization was upheld and the Revenue cannot reclassify such EDC as contractor payments. The Court found the identical issue in prior proceedings between the same parties decided in favour of the assessee, and accordingly affirmed that TDS treatment premised on rent is correct, precluding the Revenue's attempt to treat EDC as payments to a contractor under a different provision.
The HC upheld the decision favoring the assessee, concluding that External Development Charges (EDC) received by a government authority from private builders constitute "rent" for use of land and therefore fall within the taxable ambit under the relevant TDS provisions; the Assessing Officer's characterization was upheld and the Revenue cannot reclassify such EDC as contractor payments. The Court found the identical issue in prior proceedings between the same parties decided in favour of the assessee, and accordingly affirmed that TDS treatment premised on rent is correct, precluding the Revenue's attempt to treat EDC as payments to a contractor under a different provision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.