Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT affirmed that each assessment year stands on its own and dismissed the res judicata contention, holding that the Assessing Officer may assess income according to the facts of the year. The Tribunal found that maintenance, support, education and training services were intricately and inextricably linked to software and provided in connection with its utilization under Article 5(a) of the DTAA, and therefore did not constitute Fees for Technical Services. The Tribunal further held that the taxpayer's transactions did not satisfy the "make available" condition under Article 12(4)(b), placed the burden on the Revenue to prove otherwise, and directed the AO to delete the impugned addition.
ITAT affirmed that each assessment year stands on its own and dismissed the res judicata contention, holding that the Assessing Officer may assess income according to the facts of the year. The Tribunal found that maintenance, support, education and training services were intricately and inextricably linked to software and provided in connection with its utilization under Article 5(a) of the DTAA, and therefore did not constitute Fees for Technical Services. The Tribunal further held that the taxpayer's transactions did not satisfy the "make available" condition under Article 12(4)(b), placed the burden on the Revenue to prove otherwise, and directed the AO to delete the impugned addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.