Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the entire transfer pricing adjustment. The Tribunal held that the TPO erred in rejecting the assessee's internal CUP analysis and in resorting to TNMM; factual findings (including AE financial disclosures and back-to-back invoicing) established the AE as a pass-through with no commission and exact product comparability, making internal CUP the most appropriate method. Alternatively, internal TNMM was also held appropriate. Consequently the TP adjustment was deleted. The Tribunal further directed deletion of the disallowance under s.14A (and Rule 8D computation) by the AO/DRP, since no exempt income arose in the relevant year.
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the entire transfer pricing adjustment. The Tribunal held that the TPO erred in rejecting the assessee's internal CUP analysis and in resorting to TNMM; factual findings (including AE financial disclosures and back-to-back invoicing) established the AE as a pass-through with no commission and exact product comparability, making internal CUP the most appropriate method. Alternatively, internal TNMM was also held appropriate. Consequently the TP adjustment was deleted. The Tribunal further directed deletion of the disallowance under s.14A (and Rule 8D computation) by the AO/DRP, since no exempt income arose in the relevant year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.