Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the entire transfer pricing adjustment. The Tribunal held that the TPO erred in rejecting the assessee's internal CUP analysis and in resorting to TNMM; factual findings (including AE financial disclosures and back-to-back invoicing) established the AE as a pass-through with no commission and exact product comparability, making internal CUP the most appropriate method. Alternatively, internal TNMM was also held appropriate. Consequently the TP adjustment was deleted. The Tribunal further directed deletion of the disallowance under s.14A (and Rule 8D computation) by the AO/DRP, since no exempt income arose in the relevant year.
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the entire transfer pricing adjustment. The Tribunal held that the TPO erred in rejecting the assessee's internal CUP analysis and in resorting to TNMM; factual findings (including AE financial disclosures and back-to-back invoicing) established the AE as a pass-through with no commission and exact product comparability, making internal CUP the most appropriate method. Alternatively, internal TNMM was also held appropriate. Consequently the TP adjustment was deleted. The Tribunal further directed deletion of the disallowance under s.14A (and Rule 8D computation) by the AO/DRP, since no exempt income arose in the relevant year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.