Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CESTAT allowed the appeal and quashed and set aside the impugned order revoking the customs broker licence and imposing forfeiture/penalty to the extent it was predicated on alleged non-existent exporters. The Tribunal found that verification reports were supplied for only four exporters and that the Revenue adduced no contrary evidence for three; for the fourth the verification affirmatively indicated prior existence and GST filings until August 2019, with subsequent departure from premises. Given the insufficiency of proof on the majority of alleged non-existent exporters, the punitive measures could not be sustained and the impugned order was annulled.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and quashed and set aside the impugned order revoking the customs broker licence and imposing forfeiture/penalty to the extent it was predicated on alleged non-existent exporters. The Tribunal found that verification reports were supplied for only four exporters and that the Revenue adduced no contrary evidence for three; for the fourth the verification affirmatively indicated prior existence and GST filings until August 2019, with subsequent departure from premises. Given the insufficiency of proof on the majority of alleged non-existent exporters, the punitive measures could not be sustained and the impugned order was annulled.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.