Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition for lack of maintainability, holding the statutory appellate remedy under the C.G.S.T./W.B.G.S.T. Act, 2017 to be efficacious and exclusive; therefore the court declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction to entertain the challenge to levy of tax, interest and penalty. The court affirmed refusal to permit the Appellant to bypass the appellate forum, noting the appellate authority can examine records, access relevant portals and afford an effective personal hearing. The petition was dismissed and the Appellant directed to file a statutory appeal before the appellate authority within 60 days from receipt of the server copy of this judgment; such appeal shall be entertained without reference to limitation, subject to compliance with other conditions.
The HC dismissed the petition for lack of maintainability, holding the statutory appellate remedy under the C.G.S.T./W.B.G.S.T. Act, 2017 to be efficacious and exclusive; therefore the court declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction to entertain the challenge to levy of tax, interest and penalty. The court affirmed refusal to permit the Appellant to bypass the appellate forum, noting the appellate authority can examine records, access relevant portals and afford an effective personal hearing. The petition was dismissed and the Appellant directed to file a statutory appeal before the appellate authority within 60 days from receipt of the server copy of this judgment; such appeal shall be entertained without reference to limitation, subject to compliance with other conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.