Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition for lack of maintainability, holding the statutory appellate remedy under the C.G.S.T./W.B.G.S.T. Act, 2017 to be efficacious and exclusive; therefore the court declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction to entertain the challenge to levy of tax, interest and penalty. The court affirmed refusal to permit the Appellant to bypass the appellate forum, noting the appellate authority can examine records, access relevant portals and afford an effective personal hearing. The petition was dismissed and the Appellant directed to file a statutory appeal before the appellate authority within 60 days from receipt of the server copy of this judgment; such appeal shall be entertained without reference to limitation, subject to compliance with other conditions.
The HC dismissed the petition for lack of maintainability, holding the statutory appellate remedy under the C.G.S.T./W.B.G.S.T. Act, 2017 to be efficacious and exclusive; therefore the court declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction to entertain the challenge to levy of tax, interest and penalty. The court affirmed refusal to permit the Appellant to bypass the appellate forum, noting the appellate authority can examine records, access relevant portals and afford an effective personal hearing. The petition was dismissed and the Appellant directed to file a statutory appeal before the appellate authority within 60 days from receipt of the server copy of this judgment; such appeal shall be entertained without reference to limitation, subject to compliance with other conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.