Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC issues writ of certiorari quashing the adjudication order of respondent authorities and allows the petition. The court held that non-claim of ITC in 2018-19 and its subsequent claim in 2019-20 (including RCM amounts) could be reconciled from records already in the possession of the Revenue, and such reconciliation did not hinge on the petitioner's response to the show-cause notice. Consequently, the impugned adjudication lacked basis and was set aside. The adjudicatory order of respondent No.2 is quashed and the petition is allowed.
HC issues writ of certiorari quashing the adjudication order of respondent authorities and allows the petition. The court held that non-claim of ITC in 2018-19 and its subsequent claim in 2019-20 (including RCM amounts) could be reconciled from records already in the possession of the Revenue, and such reconciliation did not hinge on the petitioner's response to the show-cause notice. Consequently, the impugned adjudication lacked basis and was set aside. The adjudicatory order of respondent No.2 is quashed and the petition is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
