Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
ITAT upheld the AO and CIT(A)'s adoption of the stamp duty value of Rs.67,14,284 as full value of consideration under s.50C, finding no infirmity and noting no request for DVO reference. On s.54 exemption, ITAT accepted in principle the assessee's asserted 2:1 contribution ratio to the new residential property and directed the AO to verify actual contributions of the assessee and spouse and grant exemption proportionately if substantiated. Regarding indexed cost of improvements, ITAT found the absence of bank entry not determinative given the antiquity of the works and directed the AO to allow the claimed indexed improvement cost if contractor bills and supporting evidence credibly establish payment.
ITAT upheld the AO and CIT(A)'s adoption of the stamp duty value of Rs.67,14,284 as full value of consideration under s.50C, finding no infirmity and noting no request for DVO reference. On s.54 exemption, ITAT accepted in principle the assessee's asserted 2:1 contribution ratio to the new residential property and directed the AO to verify actual contributions of the assessee and spouse and grant exemption proportionately if substantiated. Regarding indexed cost of improvements, ITAT found the absence of bank entry not determinative given the antiquity of the works and directed the AO to allow the claimed indexed improvement cost if contractor bills and supporting evidence credibly establish payment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
