Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT dismisses the appeal and upholds reassessment and...
Appeal dismissed; reassessment and penalties upheld for deliberate RSP mis-declaration; valuation redetermined under Rules 5,7,12; s28(4) and ss114A/114AA affirmed
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
CESTAT dismisses the appeal and upholds reassessment and penalties. The Tribunal found deliberate mis-declaration of RSP on Bills of Entry, contrasted with recovered tags showing an RSP approximately ten times higher; the declared assessable value was rejected under Rule 12 and re-determined under Rules 5 and 7 of the Valuation Rules. The revenue validly invoked extended limitation under suppression of facts and confirmed demand under section 28(4). Penalties under sections 114A and 114AA were lawfully imposed for willful misstatement/suppression and short levy, given post-clearance affixation of correct price tags did not constitute manufacture rendering the original declaration bona fide. The impugned order is affirmed; appeal dismissed.
CESTAT dismisses the appeal and upholds reassessment and penalties. The Tribunal found deliberate mis-declaration of RSP on Bills of Entry, contrasted with recovered tags showing an RSP approximately ten times higher; the declared assessable value was rejected under Rule 12 and re-determined under Rules 5 and 7 of the Valuation Rules. The revenue validly invoked extended limitation under suppression of facts and confirmed demand under section 28(4). Penalties under sections 114A and 114AA were lawfully imposed for willful misstatement/suppression and short levy, given post-clearance affixation of correct price tags did not constitute manufacture rendering the original declaration bona fide. The impugned order is affirmed; appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.