Limitation in customs appeals permits exclusion for bona fide refund proceedings, enabling restoration of Bill of Entry assessment challenges on merit...
Warehousing permission requires deposit at the designated bonded warehouse; unauthorised diversion triggers confiscation, redemption fine and importer...
The HC allowed the petition under section 74 of the UP VAT Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The court held that the petitioner failed to adduce material proving payment through banking channels, yet the initiation of proceedings rested on a subsequent physical inspection finding the selling dealer absent despite contemporaneous filings (GSTR-1/3B) evidencing returns and tax payment. Absent any recorded finding of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression to evade tax, section 74 could not be validly invoked. The HC directed the assessing authority to verify transactional records on statutory portals and reconsider assessment in accordance with law and applicable procedural circulars.
The HC allowed the petition under section 74 of the UP VAT Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The court held that the petitioner failed to adduce material proving payment through banking channels, yet the initiation of proceedings rested on a subsequent physical inspection finding the selling dealer absent despite contemporaneous filings (GSTR-1/3B) evidencing returns and tax payment. Absent any recorded finding of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression to evade tax, section 74 could not be validly invoked. The HC directed the assessing authority to verify transactional records on statutory portals and reconsider assessment in accordance with law and applicable procedural circulars.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
