Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC allowed the petition under section 74 of the UP VAT Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The court held that the petitioner failed to adduce material proving payment through banking channels, yet the initiation of proceedings rested on a subsequent physical inspection finding the selling dealer absent despite contemporaneous filings (GSTR-1/3B) evidencing returns and tax payment. Absent any recorded finding of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression to evade tax, section 74 could not be validly invoked. The HC directed the assessing authority to verify transactional records on statutory portals and reconsider assessment in accordance with law and applicable procedural circulars.
The HC allowed the petition under section 74 of the UP VAT Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The court held that the petitioner failed to adduce material proving payment through banking channels, yet the initiation of proceedings rested on a subsequent physical inspection finding the selling dealer absent despite contemporaneous filings (GSTR-1/3B) evidencing returns and tax payment. Absent any recorded finding of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression to evade tax, section 74 could not be validly invoked. The HC directed the assessing authority to verify transactional records on statutory portals and reconsider assessment in accordance with law and applicable procedural circulars.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
