Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The HC dismissed the petition challenging a show-cause issued under section 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act. The court found the appellant availed ITC from bona fide purchases which bore no nexus to outward sales, and the adjudicating authority relied on documents disclosed by the petitioner following a search and panchnama at the petitioner's residence. The contention of procedural prejudice for denial of cross-examination of witnesses (truck drivers) and alleged statements made under duress was rejected: none of the witnesses retracted their statements, and the petitioner failed to produce evidence or call those witnesses initially. The court held the onus lay on the petitioner to produce corroborating evidence; allegations of natural justice breach were unfounded. Petition dismissed.
The HC dismissed the petition challenging a show-cause issued under section 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act. The court found the appellant availed ITC from bona fide purchases which bore no nexus to outward sales, and the adjudicating authority relied on documents disclosed by the petitioner following a search and panchnama at the petitioner's residence. The contention of procedural prejudice for denial of cross-examination of witnesses (truck drivers) and alleged statements made under duress was rejected: none of the witnesses retracted their statements, and the petitioner failed to produce evidence or call those witnesses initially. The court held the onus lay on the petitioner to produce corroborating evidence; allegations of natural justice breach were unfounded. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
