Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
The HC dismissed the petition challenging a show-cause issued under section 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act. The court found the appellant availed ITC from bona fide purchases which bore no nexus to outward sales, and the adjudicating authority relied on documents disclosed by the petitioner following a search and panchnama at the petitioner's residence. The contention of procedural prejudice for denial of cross-examination of witnesses (truck drivers) and alleged statements made under duress was rejected: none of the witnesses retracted their statements, and the petitioner failed to produce evidence or call those witnesses initially. The court held the onus lay on the petitioner to produce corroborating evidence; allegations of natural justice breach were unfounded. Petition dismissed.
The HC dismissed the petition challenging a show-cause issued under section 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act. The court found the appellant availed ITC from bona fide purchases which bore no nexus to outward sales, and the adjudicating authority relied on documents disclosed by the petitioner following a search and panchnama at the petitioner's residence. The contention of procedural prejudice for denial of cross-examination of witnesses (truck drivers) and alleged statements made under duress was rejected: none of the witnesses retracted their statements, and the petitioner failed to produce evidence or call those witnesses initially. The court held the onus lay on the petitioner to produce corroborating evidence; allegations of natural justice breach were unfounded. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.