Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition challenging a show-cause issued under section 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act. The court found the appellant availed ITC from bona fide purchases which bore no nexus to outward sales, and the adjudicating authority relied on documents disclosed by the petitioner following a search and panchnama at the petitioner's residence. The contention of procedural prejudice for denial of cross-examination of witnesses (truck drivers) and alleged statements made under duress was rejected: none of the witnesses retracted their statements, and the petitioner failed to produce evidence or call those witnesses initially. The court held the onus lay on the petitioner to produce corroborating evidence; allegations of natural justice breach were unfounded. Petition dismissed.
The HC dismissed the petition challenging a show-cause issued under section 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act. The court found the appellant availed ITC from bona fide purchases which bore no nexus to outward sales, and the adjudicating authority relied on documents disclosed by the petitioner following a search and panchnama at the petitioner's residence. The contention of procedural prejudice for denial of cross-examination of witnesses (truck drivers) and alleged statements made under duress was rejected: none of the witnesses retracted their statements, and the petitioner failed to produce evidence or call those witnesses initially. The court held the onus lay on the petitioner to produce corroborating evidence; allegations of natural justice breach were unfounded. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
