Income Disclosure Scheme immunity and search-material requirements barred further share-transaction additions in unabated assessments under section 15...
Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
The HC quashed the impugned reopening assessments for AY 2016-17 and 2017-18, holding that respondent(s) failed to disclose reasons for reopening and issued final assessment orders without providing a draft assessment order, thereby violating principles of natural justice and established judicial precedent. For AY 2018-19, the HC quashed the order passed under s.148A(d) and the notice under s.148, finding denial of opportunity to seek adjournment and breach of s.148A(c). The matter is remitted to the AO to afford the petitioner an opportunity to file a reply to the s.148A(b) notice and thereafter pass a fresh s.148A(d) order in accordance with law, preferably within 12 weeks.
The HC quashed the impugned reopening assessments for AY 2016-17 and 2017-18, holding that respondent(s) failed to disclose reasons for reopening and issued final assessment orders without providing a draft assessment order, thereby violating principles of natural justice and established judicial precedent. For AY 2018-19, the HC quashed the order passed under s.148A(d) and the notice under s.148, finding denial of opportunity to seek adjournment and breach of s.148A(c). The matter is remitted to the AO to afford the petitioner an opportunity to file a reply to the s.148A(b) notice and thereafter pass a fresh s.148A(d) order in accordance with law, preferably within 12 weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
