Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that Isabgol Husk (bhusi) constitutes a medicinal product, not a kirana commodity. Applying the established functional-character test (ordinary purpose and use), the court found husk, obtained after removal of grain and used primarily as a laxative for treating constipation and related stomach disorders, differs materially from Isabgol listed as a separate item. Consequently, the Board of Revenue's order dated 26.12.1995 was affirmed: Isabgol Husk is classifiable as a medicine and assessable at 3% under Entry 16, Part IV, Schedule II of the M.P.G.S.T. Act, and is not liable to classification or taxation under Entry 13, Part VI, Schedule II as kirana goods. Application disposed.
HC held that Isabgol Husk (bhusi) constitutes a medicinal product, not a kirana commodity. Applying the established functional-character test (ordinary purpose and use), the court found husk, obtained after removal of grain and used primarily as a laxative for treating constipation and related stomach disorders, differs materially from Isabgol listed as a separate item. Consequently, the Board of Revenue's order dated 26.12.1995 was affirmed: Isabgol Husk is classifiable as a medicine and assessable at 3% under Entry 16, Part IV, Schedule II of the M.P.G.S.T. Act, and is not liable to classification or taxation under Entry 13, Part VI, Schedule II as kirana goods. Application disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.