Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
HC directed refund of the deposit with interest and consideration of alleged wrongful negative blocking of ITC where the amount was collected against the Petitioner's will and purportedly contravened applicable CBIC guidance. The Court found an undue delay in adjudicating the Petitioner's representation and ordered the Petitioner to appear before the Additional Director General, DGGI, Gurugram Zonal Unit on 09 Sept 2025 at 11:30 AM. The authority is directed to hear the Petitioner and decide the representation by a reasoned order by 15 Oct 2025. All statutory and other rights and remedies of the parties are expressly kept open. Petition disposed of.
HC directed refund of the deposit with interest and consideration of alleged wrongful negative blocking of ITC where the amount was collected against the Petitioner's will and purportedly contravened applicable CBIC guidance. The Court found an undue delay in adjudicating the Petitioner's representation and ordered the Petitioner to appear before the Additional Director General, DGGI, Gurugram Zonal Unit on 09 Sept 2025 at 11:30 AM. The authority is directed to hear the Petitioner and decide the representation by a reasoned order by 15 Oct 2025. All statutory and other rights and remedies of the parties are expressly kept open. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.