Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC directed refund of the deposit with interest and consideration of alleged wrongful negative blocking of ITC where the amount was collected against the Petitioner's will and purportedly contravened applicable CBIC guidance. The Court found an undue delay in adjudicating the Petitioner's representation and ordered the Petitioner to appear before the Additional Director General, DGGI, Gurugram Zonal Unit on 09 Sept 2025 at 11:30 AM. The authority is directed to hear the Petitioner and decide the representation by a reasoned order by 15 Oct 2025. All statutory and other rights and remedies of the parties are expressly kept open. Petition disposed of.
HC directed refund of the deposit with interest and consideration of alleged wrongful negative blocking of ITC where the amount was collected against the Petitioner's will and purportedly contravened applicable CBIC guidance. The Court found an undue delay in adjudicating the Petitioner's representation and ordered the Petitioner to appear before the Additional Director General, DGGI, Gurugram Zonal Unit on 09 Sept 2025 at 11:30 AM. The authority is directed to hear the Petitioner and decide the representation by a reasoned order by 15 Oct 2025. All statutory and other rights and remedies of the parties are expressly kept open. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.