Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
The HC granted anticipatory bail to the applicants in a GST-related prosecution alleging fraudulent invoicing, falsified e-way bills and wrongful Input Tax Credit claims, holding custodial interrogation unwarranted at this stage. The court found the investigation rested predominantly on documentary and digital records-including GST returns, invoices, e-way bills, toll data and seized financial records-which have already been taken into custody by authorities, and the prosecution failed to demonstrate any specific necessity for detention to secure evidence. Applying the principle that grant of anticipatory bail depends on case facts, the HC allowed anticipatory bail subject to conditions, observing that investigation can proceed effectively without custodial interrogation.
The HC granted anticipatory bail to the applicants in a GST-related prosecution alleging fraudulent invoicing, falsified e-way bills and wrongful Input Tax Credit claims, holding custodial interrogation unwarranted at this stage. The court found the investigation rested predominantly on documentary and digital records-including GST returns, invoices, e-way bills, toll data and seized financial records-which have already been taken into custody by authorities, and the prosecution failed to demonstrate any specific necessity for detention to secure evidence. Applying the principle that grant of anticipatory bail depends on case facts, the HC allowed anticipatory bail subject to conditions, observing that investigation can proceed effectively without custodial interrogation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.