Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC granted anticipatory bail to the applicants in a GST-related prosecution alleging fraudulent invoicing, falsified e-way bills and wrongful Input Tax Credit claims, holding custodial interrogation unwarranted at this stage. The court found the investigation rested predominantly on documentary and digital records-including GST returns, invoices, e-way bills, toll data and seized financial records-which have already been taken into custody by authorities, and the prosecution failed to demonstrate any specific necessity for detention to secure evidence. Applying the principle that grant of anticipatory bail depends on case facts, the HC allowed anticipatory bail subject to conditions, observing that investigation can proceed effectively without custodial interrogation.
The HC granted anticipatory bail to the applicants in a GST-related prosecution alleging fraudulent invoicing, falsified e-way bills and wrongful Input Tax Credit claims, holding custodial interrogation unwarranted at this stage. The court found the investigation rested predominantly on documentary and digital records-including GST returns, invoices, e-way bills, toll data and seized financial records-which have already been taken into custody by authorities, and the prosecution failed to demonstrate any specific necessity for detention to secure evidence. Applying the principle that grant of anticipatory bail depends on case facts, the HC allowed anticipatory bail subject to conditions, observing that investigation can proceed effectively without custodial interrogation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.