Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld that consolidation of a single SCN for multiple years is permissible where Input Tax Credit in excess of Rs. 41 crores is alleged to have been fraudulently availed; the primary allegation against the Petitioner mirrors that precedent. The court recorded that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, and granted the Petitioner liberty to file an appeal by 30 September 2025 upon making the requisite pre-deposits. If the appeal is instituted within the stipulated period, the Appellate Authority is directed not to reject it on limitation grounds but to decide the matter on its merits.
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld that consolidation of a single SCN for multiple years is permissible where Input Tax Credit in excess of Rs. 41 crores is alleged to have been fraudulently availed; the primary allegation against the Petitioner mirrors that precedent. The court recorded that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, and granted the Petitioner liberty to file an appeal by 30 September 2025 upon making the requisite pre-deposits. If the appeal is instituted within the stipulated period, the Appellate Authority is directed not to reject it on limitation grounds but to decide the matter on its merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.