Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that notices issued beyond the 10-year limitation under s.149 lacked statutory mandate and were void for want of jurisdiction; jurisdictional defect is binary and resolved in favour of the assessee. A subsequent reliance on s.150 could not cure the limitation bar because the twin conditions in s.150 (findings in furtherance of the appellate order and specific direction) were not satisfied, and allowing s.150 to operate as a rescue would effectively negate the statutory limitation. Consequently the s.148 notice and all ensuing proceedings were declared unsustainable and quashed. Writ petitions filed by the petitioner assessees under Art.226 were allowed and the assessment proceedings were set aside.
The HC held that notices issued beyond the 10-year limitation under s.149 lacked statutory mandate and were void for want of jurisdiction; jurisdictional defect is binary and resolved in favour of the assessee. A subsequent reliance on s.150 could not cure the limitation bar because the twin conditions in s.150 (findings in furtherance of the appellate order and specific direction) were not satisfied, and allowing s.150 to operate as a rescue would effectively negate the statutory limitation. Consequently the s.148 notice and all ensuing proceedings were declared unsustainable and quashed. Writ petitions filed by the petitioner assessees under Art.226 were allowed and the assessment proceedings were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.