Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that notices issued beyond the 10-year limitation under s.149 lacked statutory mandate and were void for want of jurisdiction; jurisdictional defect is binary and resolved in favour of the assessee. A subsequent reliance on s.150 could not cure the limitation bar because the twin conditions in s.150 (findings in furtherance of the appellate order and specific direction) were not satisfied, and allowing s.150 to operate as a rescue would effectively negate the statutory limitation. Consequently the s.148 notice and all ensuing proceedings were declared unsustainable and quashed. Writ petitions filed by the petitioner assessees under Art.226 were allowed and the assessment proceedings were set aside.
The HC held that notices issued beyond the 10-year limitation under s.149 lacked statutory mandate and were void for want of jurisdiction; jurisdictional defect is binary and resolved in favour of the assessee. A subsequent reliance on s.150 could not cure the limitation bar because the twin conditions in s.150 (findings in furtherance of the appellate order and specific direction) were not satisfied, and allowing s.150 to operate as a rescue would effectively negate the statutory limitation. Consequently the s.148 notice and all ensuing proceedings were declared unsustainable and quashed. Writ petitions filed by the petitioner assessees under Art.226 were allowed and the assessment proceedings were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.