Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the revenue's attempt to reopen concluded proceedings arising from delayed employee contributions to statutory funds, holding that a subsequent change in law or later SC determinations do not constitute a proper ground for review of final adjudications. The Tribunal's order was assessed on the law prevailing when it was rendered, and a later judicial development cannot exume or revive a closed determination; at best it governs future adjudications. Given settled authority that change of law alone does not warrant re-opening concluded matters, the HC declined to remit the matter for fresh consideration and directed the parties to abide by the operative law at the time of the original decision.
The HC dismissed the revenue's attempt to reopen concluded proceedings arising from delayed employee contributions to statutory funds, holding that a subsequent change in law or later SC determinations do not constitute a proper ground for review of final adjudications. The Tribunal's order was assessed on the law prevailing when it was rendered, and a later judicial development cannot exume or revive a closed determination; at best it governs future adjudications. Given settled authority that change of law alone does not warrant re-opening concluded matters, the HC declined to remit the matter for fresh consideration and directed the parties to abide by the operative law at the time of the original decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
