Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the CPC's adjustment of the assessee's claim of exemption under s.10(10AA)(ii) without issuance of the statutorily mandated prior intimation under the first proviso to s.143(1)(a) was invalid. The Tribunal found the proviso's insistence on intimation and consideration of the assessee's response to be jurisdictional; absence of such intimation vitiates proceedings under s.143(1). Consequently the intimation issued by the CPC and the resultant restriction of the exemption were set aside, and the assessee's appeal was allowed, with the assessment proceedings pursuant to that intimation declared invalid in law.
The ITAT held that the CPC's adjustment of the assessee's claim of exemption under s.10(10AA)(ii) without issuance of the statutorily mandated prior intimation under the first proviso to s.143(1)(a) was invalid. The Tribunal found the proviso's insistence on intimation and consideration of the assessee's response to be jurisdictional; absence of such intimation vitiates proceedings under s.143(1). Consequently the intimation issued by the CPC and the resultant restriction of the exemption were set aside, and the assessee's appeal was allowed, with the assessment proceedings pursuant to that intimation declared invalid in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.