Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed the Transfer Pricing Officer's notional interest adjustment, holding that intercompany receipts constituted settlement of intra-group receivables leaving no outstanding claim at year-end, so no notional interest was chargeable. Marketing expenses and non-transactional bank charges were excluded from the assessee's PLI computation; operational bank charges supported by segmental accounts may be included. The assessee's artificial segmentation to minimize PLI was rejected. Five contested comparables are to be included after FAR verification, while several others (identified as functionally dissimilar) are excluded. TPO must revisit benchmarking and compute ALP accordingly. The AO is directed to apply corporate tax under s.115BBA after necessary verification. The appeal is partly allowed.
ITAT dismissed the Transfer Pricing Officer's notional interest adjustment, holding that intercompany receipts constituted settlement of intra-group receivables leaving no outstanding claim at year-end, so no notional interest was chargeable. Marketing expenses and non-transactional bank charges were excluded from the assessee's PLI computation; operational bank charges supported by segmental accounts may be included. The assessee's artificial segmentation to minimize PLI was rejected. Five contested comparables are to be included after FAR verification, while several others (identified as functionally dissimilar) are excluded. TPO must revisit benchmarking and compute ALP accordingly. The AO is directed to apply corporate tax under s.115BBA after necessary verification. The appeal is partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.