Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT allowed the appeal, set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order and directed liquidation of the corporate debtor. Relying on the resolution professional's statement that the corporate debtor lacks commercial activity and is not a going concern, the Tribunal held that a CIRP aimed at rescuing a going concern would be futile; alternatively, where the Committee of Creditors cannot be constituted, the statutorily mandated resolution mechanism cannot commence. Given the absence of a viable CoC-led resolution process and to avoid leaving the applicant remediless, the NCLAT concluded that liquidation is the sole appropriate remedy under the IBC despite the applicant being a sole related-party financial creditor.
The NCLAT allowed the appeal, set aside the Adjudicating Authority's order and directed liquidation of the corporate debtor. Relying on the resolution professional's statement that the corporate debtor lacks commercial activity and is not a going concern, the Tribunal held that a CIRP aimed at rescuing a going concern would be futile; alternatively, where the Committee of Creditors cannot be constituted, the statutorily mandated resolution mechanism cannot commence. Given the absence of a viable CoC-led resolution process and to avoid leaving the applicant remediless, the NCLAT concluded that liquidation is the sole appropriate remedy under the IBC despite the applicant being a sole related-party financial creditor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.