Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
HC dismissed petition as infructuous and non-maintainable. The Court noted the petitioner had been summoned under Section 70 of the CGST/GGST Acts, subjected to prolonged questioning and retention followed by arrest, and that Sections 70 and 69 confer summon and arrest powers respectively, with Section 70 inquiries treated as judicial proceedings. Despite factual findings about extensive questioning and a COVID test during the relevant period, the claimed relief became moot during pendency, and the petitioner had not exhausted the efficacious statutory remedy of revision. In view of mootness and availability of an alternative remedy, the petition was disposed of.
HC dismissed petition as infructuous and non-maintainable. The Court noted the petitioner had been summoned under Section 70 of the CGST/GGST Acts, subjected to prolonged questioning and retention followed by arrest, and that Sections 70 and 69 confer summon and arrest powers respectively, with Section 70 inquiries treated as judicial proceedings. Despite factual findings about extensive questioning and a COVID test during the relevant period, the claimed relief became moot during pendency, and the petitioner had not exhausted the efficacious statutory remedy of revision. In view of mootness and availability of an alternative remedy, the petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.