Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
HC held that, pursuant to the Supreme Court precedent, approval of a Resolution Plan by the NCLT conclusively bars subsequent claims by other creditors as such claims would disrupt the resolution process. Applying that principle, the Court found no justification to sustain a post-approval tax assessment and accordingly quashed the impugned assessment order dated 29.04.2025 issued under Section 74(9) of the CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 against the Petitioner. The petition was allowed and the assessment order set aside, leaving the approved Resolution Plan and the insolvency resolution framework undisturbed; no further dues may be created against the Petitioner arising from the specified assessment.
HC held that, pursuant to the Supreme Court precedent, approval of a Resolution Plan by the NCLT conclusively bars subsequent claims by other creditors as such claims would disrupt the resolution process. Applying that principle, the Court found no justification to sustain a post-approval tax assessment and accordingly quashed the impugned assessment order dated 29.04.2025 issued under Section 74(9) of the CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 against the Petitioner. The petition was allowed and the assessment order set aside, leaving the approved Resolution Plan and the insolvency resolution framework undisturbed; no further dues may be created against the Petitioner arising from the specified assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.