Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4381 to 4400 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that, pursuant to the Supreme Court precedent, approval of a Resolution Plan by the NCLT conclusively bars subsequent claims by other creditors as such claims would disrupt the resolution process. Applying that principle, the Court found no justification to sustain a post-approval tax assessment and accordingly quashed the impugned assessment order dated 29.04.2025 issued under Section 74(9) of the CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 against the Petitioner. The petition was allowed and the assessment order set aside, leaving the approved Resolution Plan and the insolvency resolution framework undisturbed; no further dues may be created against the Petitioner arising from the specified assessment.
HC held that, pursuant to the Supreme Court precedent, approval of a Resolution Plan by the NCLT conclusively bars subsequent claims by other creditors as such claims would disrupt the resolution process. Applying that principle, the Court found no justification to sustain a post-approval tax assessment and accordingly quashed the impugned assessment order dated 29.04.2025 issued under Section 74(9) of the CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 against the Petitioner. The petition was allowed and the assessment order set aside, leaving the approved Resolution Plan and the insolvency resolution framework undisturbed; no further dues may be created against the Petitioner arising from the specified assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.