Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
HC held that, pursuant to the Supreme Court precedent, approval of a Resolution Plan by the NCLT conclusively bars subsequent claims by other creditors as such claims would disrupt the resolution process. Applying that principle, the Court found no justification to sustain a post-approval tax assessment and accordingly quashed the impugned assessment order dated 29.04.2025 issued under Section 74(9) of the CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 against the Petitioner. The petition was allowed and the assessment order set aside, leaving the approved Resolution Plan and the insolvency resolution framework undisturbed; no further dues may be created against the Petitioner arising from the specified assessment.
HC held that, pursuant to the Supreme Court precedent, approval of a Resolution Plan by the NCLT conclusively bars subsequent claims by other creditors as such claims would disrupt the resolution process. Applying that principle, the Court found no justification to sustain a post-approval tax assessment and accordingly quashed the impugned assessment order dated 29.04.2025 issued under Section 74(9) of the CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 against the Petitioner. The petition was allowed and the assessment order set aside, leaving the approved Resolution Plan and the insolvency resolution framework undisturbed; no further dues may be created against the Petitioner arising from the specified assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.