Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC found that the petitioner committed an inadvertent clerical error in Form GSTR-1 by reflecting the turnover of a sister concern, causing discrepancies with Form GSTR-3B and resultant disallowance of excess ITC claims. The impugned order dated 12.02.2025 in GST APL-04 issued by the respondent is quashed and set aside. The petitioner is granted relief to rectify the error and is permitted to file a rectified Form GSTR-1 within four weeks, which the respondent must accept manually and process in accordance with law. Petition allowed and statutory consequences to follow as per applicable GST provisions.
The HC found that the petitioner committed an inadvertent clerical error in Form GSTR-1 by reflecting the turnover of a sister concern, causing discrepancies with Form GSTR-3B and resultant disallowance of excess ITC claims. The impugned order dated 12.02.2025 in GST APL-04 issued by the respondent is quashed and set aside. The petitioner is granted relief to rectify the error and is permitted to file a rectified Form GSTR-1 within four weeks, which the respondent must accept manually and process in accordance with law. Petition allowed and statutory consequences to follow as per applicable GST provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
