Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC found that the petitioner committed an inadvertent clerical error in Form GSTR-1 by reflecting the turnover of a sister concern, causing discrepancies with Form GSTR-3B and resultant disallowance of excess ITC claims. The impugned order dated 12.02.2025 in GST APL-04 issued by the respondent is quashed and set aside. The petitioner is granted relief to rectify the error and is permitted to file a rectified Form GSTR-1 within four weeks, which the respondent must accept manually and process in accordance with law. Petition allowed and statutory consequences to follow as per applicable GST provisions.
The HC found that the petitioner committed an inadvertent clerical error in Form GSTR-1 by reflecting the turnover of a sister concern, causing discrepancies with Form GSTR-3B and resultant disallowance of excess ITC claims. The impugned order dated 12.02.2025 in GST APL-04 issued by the respondent is quashed and set aside. The petitioner is granted relief to rectify the error and is permitted to file a rectified Form GSTR-1 within four weeks, which the respondent must accept manually and process in accordance with law. Petition allowed and statutory consequences to follow as per applicable GST provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
