Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Market value for captive electricity consumption follows industrial consumer tariffs, supporting profit computation for the power generation deduction...
HC dismissed as withdrawn a writ challenging an order passed by the proper officer under s.73(9) of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017, where the departmental appellate tribunal had not been constituted. The Court noted that, at the time of filing, a departmental circular dated 11 July 2024 was already extant and the petitioners had delayed payment of the amount determined by tax authorities. The petitioners sought withdrawal of the writ; the HC declined to permit invocation of extraordinary jurisdiction to further delay the statutory revenue deposit and ordered dismissal of the petition as withdrawn, subject to payment of costs of Rs.100,000 to the GST authorities.
HC dismissed as withdrawn a writ challenging an order passed by the proper officer under s.73(9) of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017, where the departmental appellate tribunal had not been constituted. The Court noted that, at the time of filing, a departmental circular dated 11 July 2024 was already extant and the petitioners had delayed payment of the amount determined by tax authorities. The petitioners sought withdrawal of the writ; the HC declined to permit invocation of extraordinary jurisdiction to further delay the statutory revenue deposit and ordered dismissal of the petition as withdrawn, subject to payment of costs of Rs.100,000 to the GST authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
