Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld that the reopening of reassessment under s.147 was invalid because it relied on an addition treating management charges paid to foreign principals as FTS under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA, an addition that had been deleted by the first appellate authority in the earlier assessment year and attained finality. The Tribunal found the foundational basis for reassessment absent and noted consistent appellate findings that such management charges do not constitute FTS and therefore payers had no obligation to deduct tax at source; consequential disallowance under s.40(a)(ia) was deleted. The assessee's appeal was allowed and the reassessment held unsustainable.
ITAT upheld that the reopening of reassessment under s.147 was invalid because it relied on an addition treating management charges paid to foreign principals as FTS under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA, an addition that had been deleted by the first appellate authority in the earlier assessment year and attained finality. The Tribunal found the foundational basis for reassessment absent and noted consistent appellate findings that such management charges do not constitute FTS and therefore payers had no obligation to deduct tax at source; consequential disallowance under s.40(a)(ia) was deleted. The assessee's appeal was allowed and the reassessment held unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.