Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld that the consideration for purpose of section 56(2)(x) is the actual price paid by the assessee as per the sale deed and directed that stamp duty and registration charges borne by the seller cannot be deducted from the buyer's consideration. The Tribunal agreed with CIT(A) that there is no statutory basis to adjust seller-paid stamp/registration against the purchaser's consideration. Further, treating the amendments as curative/clarificatory, ITAT applied the 5% tolerance limit retrospectively and directed the AO to delete the addition under section 56(2)(x) after applying the 5% tolerance. Other contentions of the assessee, including treatment of the asset as stock-in-trade, were allowed.
ITAT upheld that the consideration for purpose of section 56(2)(x) is the actual price paid by the assessee as per the sale deed and directed that stamp duty and registration charges borne by the seller cannot be deducted from the buyer's consideration. The Tribunal agreed with CIT(A) that there is no statutory basis to adjust seller-paid stamp/registration against the purchaser's consideration. Further, treating the amendments as curative/clarificatory, ITAT applied the 5% tolerance limit retrospectively and directed the AO to delete the addition under section 56(2)(x) after applying the 5% tolerance. Other contentions of the assessee, including treatment of the asset as stock-in-trade, were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
