Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The ITAT allowed the appellant's claims: it held the authority's activities constituted charitable purposes within s.2(15) and were therefore exempt under ss.11 and 12, the first proviso to s.2(15) not applying; the auctioning of sites was incidental to public purpose and not commercially motivated. Consequentially prior-period expenses and assets written off qualify as application of income and are allowable; payments for electrical deposits and committee accommodation are allowable pending any reversal; slum-cess disallowance under s.43B does not arise given s.11 exemption; and interest on delayed service-tax payment is deductible under s.37. The revenue's disallowances were rejected absent contrary higher-forum authority or distinguishing material.
The ITAT allowed the appellant's claims: it held the authority's activities constituted charitable purposes within s.2(15) and were therefore exempt under ss.11 and 12, the first proviso to s.2(15) not applying; the auctioning of sites was incidental to public purpose and not commercially motivated. Consequentially prior-period expenses and assets written off qualify as application of income and are allowable; payments for electrical deposits and committee accommodation are allowable pending any reversal; slum-cess disallowance under s.43B does not arise given s.11 exemption; and interest on delayed service-tax payment is deductible under s.37. The revenue's disallowances were rejected absent contrary higher-forum authority or distinguishing material.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.