Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the reassessment proceedings were jurisdictionally infirm and directed annulment of the resultant assessment. The Tribunal found the AO did not adjudicate the assessee's specific objections and that the purported draft order did not reflect disposal of objections, rendering the proceedings procedurally defective. Consequentially, the assessment order framed under section 147 read with section 144B was set aside and the notice issued under section 148 was quashed. The Tribunal allowed the additional ground raised by the assessee and remitted no matter for fresh exercise of jurisdiction in the absence of valid compliance with mandated objection-disposal procedure.
ITAT held that the reassessment proceedings were jurisdictionally infirm and directed annulment of the resultant assessment. The Tribunal found the AO did not adjudicate the assessee's specific objections and that the purported draft order did not reflect disposal of objections, rendering the proceedings procedurally defective. Consequentially, the assessment order framed under section 147 read with section 144B was set aside and the notice issued under section 148 was quashed. The Tribunal allowed the additional ground raised by the assessee and remitted no matter for fresh exercise of jurisdiction in the absence of valid compliance with mandated objection-disposal procedure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.