Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the order imposing penalties under s.112(a) & (b) of the Customs Act must be quashed insofar as the petitioners, finding a breach of audi alteram partem principles because the adjudicating authority reproduced the show-cause notice verbatim and failed to furnish independent reasons rejecting the petitioners' written replies. The court noted undisputedly that no contraband was seized from the petitioners and only from a third party. In the interest of justice the HC allowed the petitions by remitting the matters to the first respondent for fresh adjudication on merits, with directions to consider the petitioners' submissions and to record adequate, independent reasons in accordance with law.
The HC held that the order imposing penalties under s.112(a) & (b) of the Customs Act must be quashed insofar as the petitioners, finding a breach of audi alteram partem principles because the adjudicating authority reproduced the show-cause notice verbatim and failed to furnish independent reasons rejecting the petitioners' written replies. The court noted undisputedly that no contraband was seized from the petitioners and only from a third party. In the interest of justice the HC allowed the petitions by remitting the matters to the first respondent for fresh adjudication on merits, with directions to consider the petitioners' submissions and to record adequate, independent reasons in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
