TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
NCLAT allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order and granted no order as to costs. The Tribunal held that the RP's attempt to charge CIRP costs from the Appellant as a "contribution" in proportion to CoC voting share was impermissible absent valid interim finance authorised under the Code. Section 5 definitions and Section 28 require any interim finance to be sanctioned by a 66% CoC vote; Regulation 34(B) permits RP's fee to be paid from available CD funds or duly raised interim finance only. The Appellant's negative vote (39.4%) defeated the requisite 66% approval, rendering the prior order erroneous.
NCLAT allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order and granted no order as to costs. The Tribunal held that the RP's attempt to charge CIRP costs from the Appellant as a "contribution" in proportion to CoC voting share was impermissible absent valid interim finance authorised under the Code. Section 5 definitions and Section 28 require any interim finance to be sanctioned by a 66% CoC vote; Regulation 34(B) permits RP's fee to be paid from available CD funds or duly raised interim finance only. The Appellant's negative vote (39.4%) defeated the requisite 66% approval, rendering the prior order erroneous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
