Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC set aside the impugned order and restored the petition for fresh adjudication, directing impleadment of the first-charge secured creditor as a respondent and permitting full pleadings and hearing. The Court observed admitted realizations from auctioned assets and the appellant's partial payment and undertaking, and instructed the High Court to determine, under Section 35 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 11(2) of the PF Act, the priority of the first-charge secured creditor vis-Ã -vis the anonymized statutory provident fund and other secured creditors. The matter is remitted for determination of entitlement to balance recovery and priorities among secured creditors after aforestated procedural opportunities.
SC set aside the impugned order and restored the petition for fresh adjudication, directing impleadment of the first-charge secured creditor as a respondent and permitting full pleadings and hearing. The Court observed admitted realizations from auctioned assets and the appellant's partial payment and undertaking, and instructed the High Court to determine, under Section 35 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 11(2) of the PF Act, the priority of the first-charge secured creditor vis-Ã -vis the anonymized statutory provident fund and other secured creditors. The matter is remitted for determination of entitlement to balance recovery and priorities among secured creditors after aforestated procedural opportunities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
