Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC allowed the petition and set aside the assessment order dated 29.01.2025 and its summary, holding the respondent's proceedings vitiated by breach of natural justice and excessive delay. The court found the petitioner reasonably unaware of portal-notices uploaded after approximately 1½ years and held the statutory/administrative timeline for proceedings under section 73 required prompt adjudication; the belated confirmation of the show-cause proceedings and absence of effective communication rendered the assessment voidable. The matter is remitted to the first respondent for fresh consideration in accordance with law; the petition is allowed by way of remand.
The HC allowed the petition and set aside the assessment order dated 29.01.2025 and its summary, holding the respondent's proceedings vitiated by breach of natural justice and excessive delay. The court found the petitioner reasonably unaware of portal-notices uploaded after approximately 1½ years and held the statutory/administrative timeline for proceedings under section 73 required prompt adjudication; the belated confirmation of the show-cause proceedings and absence of effective communication rendered the assessment voidable. The matter is remitted to the first respondent for fresh consideration in accordance with law; the petition is allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.