Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition and set aside the assessment order dated 29.01.2025 and its summary, holding the respondent's proceedings vitiated by breach of natural justice and excessive delay. The court found the petitioner reasonably unaware of portal-notices uploaded after approximately 1½ years and held the statutory/administrative timeline for proceedings under section 73 required prompt adjudication; the belated confirmation of the show-cause proceedings and absence of effective communication rendered the assessment voidable. The matter is remitted to the first respondent for fresh consideration in accordance with law; the petition is allowed by way of remand.
The HC allowed the petition and set aside the assessment order dated 29.01.2025 and its summary, holding the respondent's proceedings vitiated by breach of natural justice and excessive delay. The court found the petitioner reasonably unaware of portal-notices uploaded after approximately 1½ years and held the statutory/administrative timeline for proceedings under section 73 required prompt adjudication; the belated confirmation of the show-cause proceedings and absence of effective communication rendered the assessment voidable. The matter is remitted to the first respondent for fresh consideration in accordance with law; the petition is allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
