Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3481 to 3500 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the writ petitions by quashing the impugned assessment orders and remitting the matters to the respondents for fresh adjudication on merits. The court noted the petitioners' failure to respond to preceding show-cause notices and considered the applicability of notifications issued under Section 168A. In view of a recent decision of the Principal Bench invalidating the impugned Section 168A notification with consequential directions, the HC set aside the assessments without deciding substantive tax liability and directed the respondents to proceed afresh, observing that consequential statutory and procedural safeguards be afforded on reconsideration. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly.
The HC allowed the writ petitions by quashing the impugned assessment orders and remitting the matters to the respondents for fresh adjudication on merits. The court noted the petitioners' failure to respond to preceding show-cause notices and considered the applicability of notifications issued under Section 168A. In view of a recent decision of the Principal Bench invalidating the impugned Section 168A notification with consequential directions, the HC set aside the assessments without deciding substantive tax liability and directed the respondents to proceed afresh, observing that consequential statutory and procedural safeguards be afforded on reconsideration. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
