Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed the appeals and upheld additions under section 40(a)(ia) consequent to non-deduction of TDS under section 194C. The Tribunal held the appellant failed to discharge the onus of proving payments were mere reimbursements and the respondent payee had not procured any certificate under sections 197/197A authorising no or lower deduction. The Tribunal ruled that section 194C does not permit contractual bifurcation of the gross sum and that the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) did not assist the appellant on the facts. Consistency principles were rejected for lack of identical factual foundation; therefore the additions were sustained and appeals dismissed.
ITAT dismissed the appeals and upheld additions under section 40(a)(ia) consequent to non-deduction of TDS under section 194C. The Tribunal held the appellant failed to discharge the onus of proving payments were mere reimbursements and the respondent payee had not procured any certificate under sections 197/197A authorising no or lower deduction. The Tribunal ruled that section 194C does not permit contractual bifurcation of the gross sum and that the second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) did not assist the appellant on the facts. Consistency principles were rejected for lack of identical factual foundation; therefore the additions were sustained and appeals dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.