Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT held that, in set-aside proceedings under the Act, the AO issued five notices u/s 142(1); the assessee failed to comply with the initial three and complied with the subsequent two. The assessee's plea of unfamiliarity with the e-filing portal was rejected as unconvincing and unsupported by non-receipt evidence. However, ITAT found that multiple successive notices seeking the same information constitute a single default, not multiple defaults. Consequently, the penalty u/s 271(1)(b) was restricted to one default: the penalty is confirmed to the extent of Rs.10,000 and the balance of the penalty imposed by the AO is deleted.
ITAT held that, in set-aside proceedings under the Act, the AO issued five notices u/s 142(1); the assessee failed to comply with the initial three and complied with the subsequent two. The assessee's plea of unfamiliarity with the e-filing portal was rejected as unconvincing and unsupported by non-receipt evidence. However, ITAT found that multiple successive notices seeking the same information constitute a single default, not multiple defaults. Consequently, the penalty u/s 271(1)(b) was restricted to one default: the penalty is confirmed to the extent of Rs.10,000 and the balance of the penalty imposed by the AO is deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.