Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT held that the provisional assessment of imported coke breeze, effected after the statutory period prescribed by Regulation 5 of the 2018 Regulations, was time-barred; accordingly the finalization dated 22.07.2022 (for import on 11.02.2014) lacked temporal validity. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the impugned order that had set aside the belated finalization, and therefore denied Revenue's contention that the goods should be reclassified or deprived of exemption under the Notification entry. The impugned order was affirmed and the appeal filed by Revenue was dismissed, with the consequence that the provisional assessment cannot be validated and the earlier determination remains binding.
CESTAT held that the provisional assessment of imported coke breeze, effected after the statutory period prescribed by Regulation 5 of the 2018 Regulations, was time-barred; accordingly the finalization dated 22.07.2022 (for import on 11.02.2014) lacked temporal validity. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the impugned order that had set aside the belated finalization, and therefore denied Revenue's contention that the goods should be reclassified or deprived of exemption under the Notification entry. The impugned order was affirmed and the appeal filed by Revenue was dismissed, with the consequence that the provisional assessment cannot be validated and the earlier determination remains binding.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
